MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885543785 · doi:10.1109/icc.2018.8422501

Pilot Decontamination for Cell-Edge Users in Multi-Cell Massive MIMO Based on Spatial Filter

2018· article· en· W2885543785 on OpenAlexaff
Zijun Gong, Cheng Li, Fan Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionFilter (signal processing)MIMOHuman decontaminationChannel (broadcasting)Base stationSIGNAL (programming language)Real-time computingElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsComputer visionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Massive MIMO has been viewed as one of the most promising techniques for 5G communications. However, its potential is highly confined by the so called pilot contamination issue. For cell-edge users, this problem is particularly critical, because their signals might be overwhelmed by their peers in adjacent cells. In this paper, we propose an innovative pilot decontamination method based on spatial filter, which can greatly improve the channel estimation accuracy for cell-edge users. There are two phases in the proposed method: pilot transmission phase and idle phase. During the first phase, users transmit pilot sequences to BS, and the BS employs matched filter to obtain channel estimation, which contains both desired signal and pilot contamination. In the second phase, all users in the target cell stay silent for one symbol period, and the BS receives signal from adjacent cells. Then, fast Fourier transform can be employed to analyze the spatial spectrums of received signals in these two phases. By comparing these two spectrums, pilot contamination components can be identified, and a spatial filter can be constructed to eliminate them. Both theoretical analysis and simulation results are presented to justify the efficacy of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207