Unbiased Age-Appropriate Structural Brain Atlases for Chinese Pediatrics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of children brain development, structural brain atlases usually serve as important references of pediatric population in which individual images are spatially normalized into a common or standard stereotactic space. However, the existing popular children brain atlases (e.g., National Institutes of Health pediatric atlases, NIH-PD atlases) are made mostly based on MR images from Western populations, and are thus insufficient to characterize the brains of Chinese children due to the neuroanatomical differences that are relevant to genetic and environmental factors. By collecting high-quality T1- and T2- weighted MR images from 328 typically developing Chinese children aged from 6 to 12 years old, we created a set of age-appropriate Chinese pediatric (CHN-PD) atlases using an unbiased template construction algorithm. The CHN-PD atlases included the head/brain templates, the symmetric brain template, the gender-specific brain templates and the corresponding tissue probability atlases. Moreover, the atlases contained multiple age-specific templates with a one-year interval. A direct comparison of the CHN-PD and the NIH-PD atlases revealed remarkable anatomical differences bilaterally in the lateral frontal and parietal regions and somatosensory cortex. While applying the CHN-PD atlases to two independent Chinese pediatric datasets (N = 114 and N = 71, respectively), machine-learning regression approaches revealed higher prediction accuracy on brain ages than the usage of NIH-PD atlases. These results suggest that the CHN-PD brain atlases are necessary and important for future typical and atypical developmental studies in Chinese pediatric population. Currently, the CHN-PD atlases have been released on the NITRC website ( https://www.nitrc.org/projects/chn-pd ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".