MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885580909 · doi:10.1101/395954

Learning unsupervised feature representations for single cell microscopy images with paired cell inpainting

2018· preprint· en· W2885580909 on OpenAlexafffund
Alex X. Lu, Oren Kraus, Sam Cooper, Alan M Moses

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsGenome CanadaToronto Centre for PhenogenomicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanada Research ChairsNvidia
KeywordsInpaintingArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkFeature (linguistics)MicroscopyComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Fluorescence microscopeProteomeComputer visionImage (mathematics)BiologyBioinformaticsFluorescencePathologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cellular microscopy images contain rich insights about biology. To extract this information, researchers use features, or measurements of the patterns of interest in the images. Here, we introduce a convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically design features for fluorescence microscopy. We use a self-supervised method to learn feature representations of single cells in microscopy images without labelled training data. We train CNNs on a simple task that leverages the inherent structure of microscopy images and controls for variation in cell morphology and imaging: given one cell from an image, the CNN is asked to predict the fluorescence pattern in a second different cell from the same image. We show that our method learns high-quality features that describe protein expression patterns in single cells both yeast and human microscopy datasets. Moreover, we demonstrate that our features are useful for exploratory biological analysis, by capturing high-resolution cellular components in a proteome-wide cluster analysis of human proteins, and by quantifying multi-localized proteins and single-cell variability. We believe paired cell inpainting is a generalizable method to obtain feature representations of single cells in multichannel microscopy images. Author Summary To understand the cell biology captured by microscopy images, researchers use features, or measurements of relevant properties of cells, such as the shape or size of cells, or the intensity of fluorescent markers. Features are the starting point of most image analysis pipelines, so their quality in representing cells is fundamental to the success of an analysis. Classically, researchers have relied on features manually defined by imaging experts. In contrast, deep learning techniques based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) automatically learn features, which can outperform manually-defined features at image analysis tasks. However, most CNN methods require large manually-annotated training datasets to learn useful features, limiting their practical application. Here, we developed a new CNN method that learns high-quality features for single cells in microscopy images, without the need for any labeled training data. We show that our features surpass other comparable features in identifying protein localization from images, and that our method can generalize to diverse datasets. By exploiting our method, researchers will be able to automatically obtain high-quality features customized to their own image datasets, facilitating many downstream analyses, as we highlight by demonstrating many possible use cases of our features in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207