MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885597179 · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/27/8/087303

Optoelectronic properties of bottom gate-defined in-plane monolayer WSe<sub>2</sub> p–n junction

2018· article· en· W2885597179 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Di Liu, Xiao‐Zhuo Qi, Kuei-Lin Chiu, Takashi Taniguchi, Xi‐Feng Ren, Guo‐Ping Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Physics B · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersResearch Nova ScotiaUniversity of Science and Technology of China
KeywordsMonolayerMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPlane (geometry)NanotechnologyGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are considered to be fantastic building blocks for a wide variety of optical and optoelectronic devices such as sensors, photodetectors, and quantum emitters, owing to their direct band gap, transparency, and mechanical flexibility. The core element of many conventional electronic and optoelectronic devices is the p–n junction, in which the p- and n-types of the semiconductor are formed by chemical doping in different regions. Here, we report a series of optoelectronic studies on a monolayer WSe 2 in-plane p–n photodetector, demonstrating a low-power dissipation by showing an ambipolar behavior with a reduced threshold voltage by a factor of two compared with the previous results on a lateral electrostatically doped WSe 2 p–n junction. The fabrication of the device is based on a polycarbonates (PC) transfer technique and hence no electron-beam exposure induced damage to the monolayer WSe 2 is expected. Upon optical excitation, the photodetector demonstrates a photoresponsivity of 0.12 mA·W −1 and a maximum external quantum efficiency of 0.03%. Our study provides an alternative platform for a flexible and transparent two-dimensional photodetector, from which we expect to further promote the development of next-generation optoelectronic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Physics BSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207