Comprehensive compensation method for thermal error of vertical drilling center
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To eliminate the influence of thermally induced error from a machine tool on machining accuracy, a comprehensive error compensation method for thermal displacement of the screw shaft and spindle is put forward. Based on a heat transfer mechanism and experimental analysis, a model of screw thermal expansion error is built. Modeling of spindle thermal growth that depends on speed variations is also proposed. Thermal tests for studying thermal behavior of the spindle and screw axis are carried out on the vertical drilling center TC500R. Finally, the compensation effect of the robust model is validated via experimental tests and machining. Experimental results show that thermal displacement variations are controlled within 2 μm when the compensation system is activated. The suggested model can achieve high accuracy and good applicability in different moving states. Machining results indicate that dimensional accuracy of the workpiece is significantly improved after implementation of compensation. Feasibility of the thermal error compensation system is satisfactory in applications for drilling operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it