MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885681944

KONSEP JAGAAN PELIHARA BERASASKAN KELUARGA : PENEROKAAN PENGETAHUAN DALAM KALANGAN IBU BAPA PELIHARA DI MALAYSIA (The Concept of Family-Based Foster Care : An Exploration of Knowledge Amongst Foster Parents in Malaysia)

2018· article· ms· W2885681944 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muzairiah Bajuri, Saim Nor Jana, Fauziah Ibrahim

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Bangi · 2018
Typearticle
Languagems
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPsychologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jagaan pelihara berasaskan keluarga (family-based foster care) merupakan jagaan gantian yang memberikan persekitaran keluarga yang bersifat fleksibel kepada kanak-kanak yang memerlukan pemeliharaan dan pelindungan. Ia merupakan satu konsep yang tidak asing lagi di kebanyakan negara-negara maju seperti Amerika, United Kingdom, Kanada dan Australia. Namun, konsep jagaan pelihara berasaskan keluarga masih lagi baru dan kurang difahami dalam kalangan masyarakat di Malaysia. Justeru kajian mengenai jagaan pelihara berasaskan keluarga masih kurang dijalankan di Malaysia. Oleh itu, objektif kajian ini adalah untuk meneroka pengetahuan konsep jagaan pelihara berasaskan keluarga dalam kalangan ibu bapa pelihara. Kajian kualitatif ini menggunakan pendekatan teori g rounded dengan penglibatan seramai 25 orang ibu bapa pelihara sebagai informan kajian yang dipilih menggunakan persampelan bertujuan. Kaedah temu bual mendalam menggunakan soalan separa berstruktur digunakan untuk pengumpulan data. Seterusnya data dianalisis menggunakan analisis tema menggunakan perisian Atlas.ti. Hasil kajian mendapati terdapat tiga tema utama iaitu (i) ketidakfahaman konsep jagaan pelihara berasaskan keluarga, (ii) kekeliruan konsep jagaan pelihara berasaskan keluarga dan pengangkatan dan (iii) sumber pengetahuan berasaskan pengalaman. Hasil kajian ini boleh dijadikan panduan untuk mewujudkan satu garis panduan bagi memastikan kefahaman yang jelas tentang konsep jagaan pelihara supaya dapat meningkatkan kesedaran dalam kalangan orang awam, dan secara tidak langsung dapat menggalakkan mereka untuk mendaftar sebagai ibu bapa pelihara bagi membantu memberi pemeliharaan kepada kanak-kanak yang memerlukan. Kata kunci: Anak pelihara, ibu bapa pelihara,  ibu bapa kandung, keluarga pelihara (The Concept of Family-Based Foster Care : An Exploration of Knowledge Amongst Foster Parents in Malaysia) Family-based foster care is a form of substitute care to provide an adaptable family environment for children that in need of care and protection. The service is well-known in most of the developed countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. However, the concept of family-based foster care is new and unfamiliar for most Malaysians. Consequently, the focus of the study is still under scrutiny especially from the Malaysians’ perspective. Hence, the research aims to explore the knowledge of foster parents about the concept of family -based foster care. This qualitative research uses grounded theory approach. 25 foster parents selected as participant by purposive sampling. The study used in-depth semi-structured method to gathered the data. Further, thematic analysis used to analyse the data by using the Atlas.ti software. Later, three main themes emerged; (i) misunderstanding of the family-based foster care concept, (ii) confusing on the concept of family-based foster care and adoption, and (iii) experience-based knowledge. Bottom line, the research finding expected to help to establish a succinct guideline as well as to ensure a clear interpretation of the concept of family-based foster care to a burgeoning public interest. The foster parents registration will motive and enable to cater the demand of needy children to get care. Keywords : Biological parents, concept of family-based foster care, foster children,  foster parents

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-BangiSame topicEducation and Islamic StudiesFrench-language works237,207