MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885748483 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/711_9

Planning Considerations for Deep Level Mining at Perseverance Mine

2007· article· en· W2885748483 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep mining · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMining engineeringData scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given the high stress and poor rock mass conditions found at the Perseverance Mine, appropriate mine engineering and planning techniques are necessary, amongst other mine operational aspects, to perform sustainable mining at current and projected depths. This paper describes the processes and techniques relevant to mine planning and the geotechnical engineering considerations used at Perseverance in the context of deep mining in the Agnew-Wiluna Greenstone Belt. Perseverance Mine produces nickel sulphide ore using sub-level caving and long-hole stoping, and is wholly owned by BHP-Billiton Nickel West. The planning efforts relating to the current sub-level caving operation and the proposed future transition to block caving at a depth in excess of one kilometre are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it