MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885798161 · doi:10.1039/c8dt02609b

[Ln<sub>16</sub>] complexes (Ln = Gd<sup>III</sup>, Dy<sup>III</sup>): molecular analogues of natural minerals such as hydrotalcite

2018· article· en· W2885798161 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul Richardson, Ting‐Jung Hsu, Che‐Jung Kuo, Rebecca J. Holmberg, Bulat Gabidullin, Mathieu Rouzières, Muralee Murugesu, Po‐Heng Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Chung-Hsing UniversityMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsHydrotalciteChemistryDysprosiumNatural mineralCrystallographyRadiochemistryInorganic chemistryMineralogyOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two new hexadecanuclear lanthanide complexes employing H <sub>2</sub> bsc ligand are crystallized in the <italic>R</italic> 3̄ space group, which is unprecedented in a family of lanthanide complexes with such high nuclearity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicMagnetism in coordination complexesFrench-language works237,207