Simultaneous Extraction of RNA and Metabolites from Single Kidney Tissue Specimens for Combined Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Profiling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tissue analysis represents a powerful tool for the investigation of disease pathophysiology. However, the heterogeneous nature of tissue samples, in particular of neoplastic, may affect the outcome of such analysis and hence obscure interpretation of results. Thus, comprehensive isolation and extraction of transcripts and metabolites from an identical tissue specimen would minimize variations and enable the economic use of biopsy material which is usually available in limited amounts. Here we demonstrate a fast and simple protocol for combined transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis in homogenates prepared from one single tissue sample. Metabolites were recovered by protein precipitation from lysates originally prepared for RNA isolation and were analyzed by LC-QTOF-MS after HILIC and RPLC separation, respectively. Strikingly, although ion suppression was observed, over 80% of the 2885 detected metabolic features could be extracted and analyzed with high reproducibility (CV ≤ 20%). Moreover fold changes of different tumor and nontumor kidney tissues were correlated to an established metabolomics protocol and revealed a strong correlation ( r p ≥ 0.75). In order to demonstrate the feasibility of the combined analysis of RNA and metabolites, the protocol was applied to kidney tissue of metformin treated mice to investigate drug induced alterations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".