MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885819346 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-5513

Abstract 5513: Role of the evolutionarily conserved TBX2 subfamily of transcription factors in the molecular pathogenesis of human lung adenocarcinoma

2018· article· en· W2885819346 on OpenAlexaff
Athar Khalil, Nehmé El-Hachem, Batoul Dekmak, Humam Kadara, Georges Nemer

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubfamilyBiologyGeneAdenocarcinomaTranscription factorLung cancerPathogenesisCancer researchGeneticsCancerPathologyImmunologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract T-box (TBX) transcription factors are evolutionary conserved genes and master regulators of transcription repression and activation. In mammals, 18 members were described functionally and structurally, of which the TBX2 subfamily (TBX2, TBX3, TBX4, TBX5) genes were shown to be expressed early on in the developing lung bud and tracheae. Despite these insights into the role of the TBX2 subfamily in normal lung organogenesis, little is known about the role of these genes in pathological pulmonary conditions in humans; particularly lung cancer, an aggressive malignancy that is the leading cause of cancer-deaths worldwide. To fill this void, our group previously surveyed the expression of TBX2 subfamily in various publicly available datasets and found that all four members were preferentially and highly expressed in human normal lung, but markedly and consistently suppressed in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) the most common histological subtype of lung cancer. We also showed that the subfamily was also suppressed in preneoplastic lesions preceding the development of LUADs. Following the above and to further elucidate the role of the TBX2 subfamily in LUAD pathogenesis, we first probed and confirmed abundant expression of protein products of the four members by immunostaining in adult human normal lung tissues. On the other hand, quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting analyses demonstrated overall suppressed expression of the genes and corresponding proteins in a panel of human LUAD cell lines. Transient over-expression of each of the four genes in human LUAD cell lines (H1299 and H1944) was found to overall significantly inhibit cancer cell growth and proliferation. Additionally, over-expression of the four genes induced apoptosis, evidenced by sub-G0/G1 accumulation following cell cycle analysis, in both cell lines (ranging from 40% to 90% compared to control). To understand genome-wide effects of TBX2 subfamily in LUAD, we interrogated global expression programs downstream of these transcription factors by RNA-Seq in H1299 cells engineered to over-express the four members separately. We unraveled novel signaling cues signifying canonical pathways found in our analysis to be directly regulated by members of the TBX2 subfamily. These included, among others, inhibition of cell cycle progression and glycolysis, suppression of pathways mediated by epidermal growth factor (EGFR) and WNT signaling and activation of the major anti-tumor immune marker interferon gamma (IFNG). All in all, our findings point to tumor suppressor roles for TBX2 subfamily in human LUAD pathogenesis and suggest “oncophenotypes” downstream of these factors as putative targets for lung cancer therapy. Citation Format: Athar Khalil, Nehme El-Hachem, Batoul Dekmak, Humam Kadara, Georges Nemer. Role of the evolutionarily conserved TBX2 subfamily of transcription factors in the molecular pathogenesis of human lung adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5513.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207