Hot spots induced by LHCD in the shadow of antenna limiters in the EAST tokamak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hot spots induced by lower hybrid wave in experimental advanced superconducting tokamak tokamak have caused high performance experiment disruption and serious damages to the guard limiters. Experimental and theoretical analyses have been carried out to study its physical mechanism. Plasma density scan experiments indicate that the wall temperature within the hot spots enhanced by a factor of 5 and increases with the plasma density near the antenna. A lower hybrid current drive (LHCD)-only density climb experiment shows that the carbon impurity decreases to a minimum value at certain plasma density and then increases with the line averaged plasma density. A model has been developed to explain the mechanism of sputtering of graphite tiles due to hot spots as the plasma density near the LHCD antenna and the time increases. A theoretical scaling of the heat flux driven by LHCD is also presented and is consistent with the experimental scaling in the Tore Supra tokamak. The simulation results show that the total sputtering flux density has a minimum at a certain plasma density and gradually increases as the plasma density increases or decreases away from the minimum value, and the increase in parallel heat flux near the antenna would enhance the sputtering flux density. The sputtering flux density trend is qualitatively consistent with the density scan experiments. The simulated temporal evolution of sputtered flux implies that the chemical sputtering could be a candidate for the carbon impurity explosion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".