Transcoding Based Video Caching Systems: Model and Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The explosive demand of online video watching brings huge bandwidth pressure to cellular networks. Efficient video caching is critical for providing high‐quality streaming Video‐on‐Demand (VoD) services to satisfy the rapid increasing demands of online video watching from mobile users. Traditional caching algorithms typically treat individual video files separately and they tend to keep the most popular video files in cache. However, in reality, one video typically corresponds to multiple different files (versions) with different sizes and also different video resolutions. Thus, caching of such files for one video leads to a lot of redundancy since one version of a video can be utilized to produce other versions of the video by using certain video coding techniques. Recently, fog computing pushes computing power to edge of network to reduce distance between service provider and users. In this paper, we take advantage of fog computing and deploy cache system at network edge. Specifically, we study transcoding based video caching in cellular networks where cache servers are deployed at the edge of cellular network for providing improved quality of online VoD services to mobile users. By using transcoding, a cached video can be used to convert to different low‐quality versions of the video as needed by different users in real time. We first formulate the transcoding based caching problem as integer linear programming problem. Then we propose a Transcoding based Caching Algorithm (TCA), which iteratively finds the placement leading to the maximal delay gain among all possible choices. We deduce the computational complexity of TCA. Simulation results demonstrate that TCA significantly outperforms traditional greedy caching algorithm with a decrease of up to 40% in terms of average delivery delay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".