MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 16866: Depressed Biventricular Outputs in Fetuses of Diabetic Mothers When Standardized to Estimated Fetal Weight

2015· article· en· W2885835320 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer M. Hickman, Mary Craft, Ling Li, Aparna Kulkarni, Lisa K. Hornberger, David A. Danford, Shelby Kutty

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFetusGestational ageCardiologyInternal medicineIn uteroCardiac function curveStroke volumeFetal echocardiographyGestational diabetesDiabetes mellitusPregnancyGestationHeart failurePrenatal diagnosisEjection fractionEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Although the results of maternal diabetes on the newborn heart are well described, in-utero cardiovascular effects of maternal diabetes and obesity are not as well understood. Hypothesis: Echocardiographically derived measures of right and left heart flow volumes in fetuses of diabetic mothers (FDM) and fetuses of obese mothers (FOM) differ from those of normal fetuses. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 264 normal fetuses, 30 FDM and 49 FOM for prenatal research echocardiography. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) based norms for aortic and pulmonary valve velocity time integrals (AVVTI, PVVTI), right and left ventricular outflow tract diameters (LVOTD, RVOTD), aortic and pulmonary valve stroke volume (AVSV, PVSV), and cardiac output (LVCO, RVCO) were derived from the 264 control group fetuses using nonlinear regression to a Gompertz growth function. Z values for each parameter were determined, then analyzed using a non-paired two-tailed t-test to compare the three groups. Results: The mean ± SD EFW (g) for normal fetuses, FDM and FOM were 1610 ± 1201, 964 ± 694 and 1075 ± 1013; respective mean gestational ages (weeks) were 28.1±1.3, 25.3± 5, and 25 ± 6.6. The table shows mean Z value comparisons of VTI, OTD, SV and CO for the RV and LV in the three groups. Conclusions: FDM have significantly lower right and left heart stroke volumes and outputs than other fetuses matched for size, while FOM did not have demonstrable right or left heart stroke volume or cardiac output changes relative to normal fetuses. Similar to their relationship with gestational age, normal right and left ventricular stroke volumes and outputs follow a non-linear correlation with estimated fetal weight. Flow volumes in macrosomic fetuses may be better normalized to EFW rather than to gestational age. Reduced placental blood flow and ventricular compliance changes may be contributing to depressed biventricular cardiac output in FDM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207