Mobilités étudiantes et socialisations professionnelles en France et au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article décrit le processus de construction d’une comparaison menée selon l’approche sociétale en recourant à une recherche ayant porté sur la mobilité internationale d’étudiants français et québécois. Après avoir présenté les traits que prend le phénomène dans les deux contextes sociétaux, ce qui permet de mieux situer les choix théoriques et méthodologiques qui se sont imposés au fur et à mesure que l’enquête progressait, les résultats exposés ont pour vocation d’illustrer les modalités de construction d’une typologie en tant qu’instrument d’analyse comparative. On voit alors en quoi la démarche typologique permet d’identifier les paramètres qui interviennent dans la construction des pratiques de mobilité et des socialisations professionnelles dans deux sociétés. Student Exchange Programs and Career Strategies in France and Quebec. Construction of a Typology as a Tool for International ComparisonThis article describes the process of elaboration of a comparative study which follows the social approach, focusing on the international mobility of French and Quebecois exchange students. After presenting the different characteristics of this phenomenon within the two social contexts, which allows us to better situate the theoretical and methodological choices of this study, the results illustrate the different conditions and terms for the construction of a typology as an instrument of comparative analysis. This typological approach enables us to identify the parameters which come into play in the construction of practices of mobility and for selecting and obtaining a job in the two societies. La movilidad del mundo estudiantil y las socializaciones profesionales en Francia y en Canadá. La construcción de una tipología como instrumento de comparación internacionalEl artículo narra el proceso de elaboración de un estudio comparativo desarrollado a partir de la aproximación relativa a lo social, focalizado sobre la movilidad internacional de los estudiantes franceses y los canadienses de Québec. Después de haber presentado los diferentes aspectos del fenómeno en los dos contextos geográficos que permiten situar con precisión los elementos teóricos y metodológicos impuestos por el estudio, los resultados expuestos tienen como objetivo la ilustración de las modalidades de construcción de una tipología en tanto que instrumento de análisis comparativo. La aproximación tipológica hace posible la identificación de los parámetros que intervienen en la construcción de la movilidad y de la socialización en los dos países.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".