MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885930006

Roa Bastos, Borges, Derrida: Escritura y deconstrucción

2002· article· es· W2885930006 on OpenAlexaff
Fernando de Toro

Bibliographic record

VenueCÉFIRO: ENLACE HISPANO CULTURAL Y LITERARIO · 2002
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBorges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roa Bastos introduce la narrativa postmodema como ciencia normal en Latinoamerica, y que al mismo tiempo desestructura la narrativa de la modemidad. Tambien hemos intentado demostrar la discusion sobre los temas centrales de la modemidad cultural y literaria, tales como la problematica sobre la lengua y la escritura, la historia y la ficcion, la oralidad y la voz, introducidos por Roa Bastos contemporaneamente e incluso antes que la discusion sobre estos temas surgiera en la obra de otros autores o teoricos tales como Derrida, Delueze, Guattari, Lyotard, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCÉFIRO: ENLACE HISPANO CULTURAL Y LITERARIOSame topicBorges, Kipling, and Jewish IdentityFrench-language works237,207