Molecular-Level Structure and Packing in Phase-Separated Arachidic Acid–Perfluorotetradecanoic Acid Monolayer Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synchrotron-based X-ray scattering measurements of phase-separated surfactant monolayers at the air–water interface provide molecular-level structural information about the packing and ordering of film components. In this work, grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD) and X-ray reflectivity (XR) measurements were used to collect crystallographic structural information for binary mixed monolayers of arachidic acid (AA, C19H39COOH) with perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PA, C13F27COOH), a system that has previously been investigated using a variety of thermodynamic and micron-scale structural characterization methods. GIXD measurements at surface pressures of π = 5, 15, and 30 mN/m indicated that AA in pure and mixed films forms a rectangular lattice at π = 5 and 15 mN/m but a hexagonal lattice at π = 30 mN/m. PA formed hexagonal lattices under all conditions, with films being highly ordered and crystalline (as determined by Bragg peak width) at even the lowest surface pressures investigated. Phase separation occurred for all mixed monolayer film compositions and surface pressures, manifesting as diffraction peaks characteristic of the individual components appearing at different in-plane scattering vector qxy. For both pure and mixed films, the molecular tilt angle of the AA hydrocarbon chain toward the nearest-neighbor was substantial at low pressures but decreased with increasing pressure. The PA fluorocarbon chain showed negligible molecular tilt under all conditions, and was oriented normal to the subphase surface regardless of surface pressure or the presence of AA in the films. In all cases, the two components in the mixed film behaved entirely independently of film composition, which is exactly the expected result for a fully phase-separated, immiscible system. XR measurements of film thickness at the air–water interface supported these results; overall film thickness approached the calculated ideal surfactant tail lengths with increasing surface pressure, indicating nearly normal oriented surfactants. The overall surfactant packing and crystallographic features of the mixed monolayers are discussed in terms of the lipophobic nature of the perfluorinated surfactant as well as in context of thermodynamic miscibility and domain structure formation reported elsewhere in the literature for these mixed monolayer systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".