MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886059231 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-5237

Abstract 5237: Sex-dependent association of circulating sex steroids, pituitary hormones and treatment-free survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

2018· article· en· W2886059231 on OpenAlexaffabout
Éric P. Allain, Karin Venzl, Patrick Caron, Véronique Turcotte, David Simonyan, Michaela Gruber, Trang N. Le, Éric Lévesque, Chantal Guillemette, Katrina Vanura

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineHormoneMedicineChronic lymphocytic leukemiaSex hormone-binding globulinEndocrinologyHazard ratioSex steroidLuteinizing hormoneCancerOncologyLeukemiaAndrogenSteroid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most frequent adult leukemia in the western world, and is not considered a hormone-regulated cancer but sex is a known risk factor with a significant male/female ratio (2:1) in its incidence with male patients more frequently developing progressive disease. We hypothesized that variable hormonal exposure may have a sexually dimorphic effect on CLL progression. However, a detailed evaluation of sex steroids and pituitary hormones in CLL patients is still lacking. In 156 CLL patients, we quantitatively profiled 15 circulating sex steroids (androgens, estrogens and progesterone) by sensitive and specific mass spectrometry and two pituitary hormones (luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicular secreting hormone (FSH)) by immunoassay. Data were analyzed separately by sex and in relation to treatment-free survival (TFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses of TFS were performed using Cox's proportional hazard model with hormone levels as continuous variables. Median age of CLL patients was 59.8 and 62.9 years for men and postmenopausal women, respectively. Common CLL prognostic markers had very similar frequencies between male and female cases. Median TFS was shorter for male patients than for women (80.7 vs. 135.0 months, P=0.033). Circulating profiles of hormones in CLL patients were significantly different from those of healthy donors whereas male cases had higher steroid levels than female patients. In male CLL cases, sex steroid levels were not significantly associated with TFS; however, higher LH levels were associated with shorter TFS in multivariate analyses with an adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) of 2.11 (P = 0.004). In female CLL cases, high levels of potent androgens testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and the sum of methoxy estrogens were significantly associated with improved TFS with HRadj values of 0.24 (P =0.007), 0.54 (P=0.023) and 0.31 (P =0.034), respectively. This study is the first to establish a link between outcome of CLL patients and circulating sex steroid and pituitary hormones, revealing a sex-specific hormonal imbalance associated with disease progression. This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant to CG. EPA holds scholarships from Université Laval foundation - Leadership and sustainable development award and CHU de Québec foundation - Fernand Labrie excellence award. Citation Format: Eric P. Allain, Karin Venzl, Patrick Caron, Véronique Turcotte, David Simonyan, Michaela Gruber, Trang Le, Éric Lévesque, Chantal Guillemette, Katrina Vanura. Sex-dependent association of circulating sex steroids, pituitary hormones and treatment-free survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5237.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207