MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimal Detection Scheme for Shot-Noise-Limited Phase Estimation in Passive Classical-Light Interferometry

2018· article· en· W2886098366 on OpenAlexafffund
Vincent Michaud-Belleau, Jérôme Genest, Jean-Daniel Deschênes

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInterferometryAstronomical interferometerNoise (video)EstimatorPhase (matter)Sensitivity (control systems)PhysicsOpticsComputer scienceComputationPhase noiseGravitational waveAlgorithmElectronic engineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phase estimation is a central goal of optical interferometry, with applications ranging from gravitational-wave detection to fiber-optic sensing. Recent progress has focused on the use of nonclassical light to improve performance, but that approach is often unreasonably complicated. The authors reexamine the simple, passive Mach-Zehnder interferometer by linearizing the phase-estimation problem, for straightforward computation of an efficient estimator, which is then used to compare several detection schemes for two- and four-output interferometers. Independent monitoring of all available output ports leads to the best overall sensitivity, and allows cancellation of amplitude noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review AppliedSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207