MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886124642

Usos pedagógicos de las TIC: del consumo a la co-creación participativa / Pedagogical uses of ICT: from consumption to participatory cocreation

2018· article· es· W2886124642 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Referencia Pedagógica · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicE-Learning and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation and Communications TechnologyCreativityConsumption (sociology)Citizen journalismKnowledge managementPedagogyComputer scienceSociologyPsychologyWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some pedagogical uses of ICT improve learning mediated by technology, but we also  observe  some  uses  of  ICT  that  place  students  in  situations  of  passive  or interactive  consumption.  To  analyze  the  different  ICT  uses,  their  limits  and potential, we introduce five levels of educational uses of ICT. First, passive consumption (e.g. videos); second, interactive consumption (e.g. interactive schoolbooks); in the third and fourth levels, creation  of  individual  or  team  content  (e.g.  create  a  story),  and  finally,  the participatory co-creation of knowledge, aimed at understanding or solving problems within a learning community. Keywords: Co-Creation,  technology,  techno-creativity,  uses  of  ICT,  technology enhanced Learning, ICT integration, educational technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it