MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886146511 · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.022

WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to long working hours and of the effect of exposure to long working hours on ischaemic heart disease

2018· article· en· W2886146511 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Li, Chantal Brisson, Els Clays, Maurizio Ferrario, Ivan D. Ivanov, Paul Landsbergis, Nancy Leppink, Frank Pega, Hynek Pikhart, Annette Prüss‐Üstün, Reiner Rugulies, Peter L. Schnall, Gretchen A Stevens, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Yuka Ujita, Johannés Siegrist

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment International · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthInternational Labour OrganizationWorld Health Organization
KeywordsIschaemic heart diseaseMedicineWorking hoursProtocol (science)Environmental healthAir pollutantsAir pollutionCardiologyAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.047
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.077
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0470.077
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0250.030
Bibliometrics0.0150.014
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEnvironment InternationalSame topicWorkplace Health and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207