Abstract 3: Patient Satisfaction and Healthcare Service Utilization Following Premature Acute Coronary Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives. Patient centered care is recognized as central to a high-quality healthcare system. Satisfaction with healthcare services may be differentially experienced among young adults suffering from heart disease. The current study examined the association between patient satisfaction with healthcare services, utilization, and clinical outcomes in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods and Results. We used data from 1033 patients (≤ 55 years) hospitalized for ACS and enrolled into the prospective cohort study, GENESIS-PRAXY (GENdEr and Sex determInantS of cardiovascular disease: from bench to beyond PRemature Acute Coronary SYndrome). Participants were recruited between January 2009-April 2013, from 24 centers across Canada, 1 in the US, and 1 in Switzerland. Patient satisfaction with treatment and subsequent healthcare service utilization/clinical outcomes were assessed within 12 months post-index ACS through questionnaire and medical chart review. The median age of our cohort ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".