Surfactant-assisted Pulse Electrodeposition of Hausmannite Nano-rods/particles with Improved Pseudocapacitive Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulse cathodic electrodeposition of manganese oxide was performed from 0.005M MnCl2 in the presence of cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). The electrosynthesis experiments were done at the simple pulse mode (ton=1ms and toff=1ms) with applying current density of 10 mA cm–2. The structural analyses through XRD and FTIR revealed that the prepared sample have the pure hausmannite crystal structure. Morphological observations by SEM showed that the deposited hausmannite has mixed rod/particle morphology. The charge storage performances of the prepared hausmannite were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry and charge-discharge techniques. The Mn3O4 working electrode exhibited only 13% capacity decay after 1000 cycles at the current load of 2 A g–1, and its SC value reduced from 239 F g–1 to 207 F g–1. The results proved that the prepared Mn3O4 nano-rods/particles are suitable electrode material for supercapacitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".