Erratum: Kinematics of the Atomic ISM in M33 on 80 pc scales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper ‘Kinematics of the Atomic ISM ifigun M33 on 80 pc scales’ was published in Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 2505–2533 (2018). During the editorial process, a typo was introduced into the title of the paper. The correct title is ‘Kinematics of the Atomic ISM in M33 on 80 pc scales.’ Table C1 also contained incorrect radial bin values for the reported units. We present the corrected values here in Table 1. This error only occurred in the table and has no effect on the results. Corrected version of Table C1. Circular rotation velocities were derived by diskfit (Sellwood & Spekkens 2015). The rotation model is fit to the peak velocity (|$v$|peak) surface of the VLA+GBT data. Corrected version of Table C1. Circular rotation velocities were derived by diskfit (Sellwood & Spekkens 2015). The rotation model is fit to the peak velocity (|$v$|peak) surface of the VLA+GBT data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.038 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".