MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886278914 · doi:10.1109/icc.2018.8423030

Capacity Enhancement for mmWave Multi-Beam Satellite-Terrestrial Backhaul via Beam Sharing

2018· article· en· W2886278914 on OpenAlexaff
Qiang Cao, Humphrey Rutagemwa, Fanqin Zhou, Peng Yu, Lei Feng, Wenjing Li, Ao Xiong, Xuesong Qiu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamwidthBackhaul (telecommunications)Computer scienceCommunications satelliteSpectral efficiencyBandwidth (computing)Computer networkSatelliteElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringBase stationAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The satellite is a primary means for providing emergency communication backhaul in disaster areas, where large bandwidth is demanded to support communication services in a wide affected area. Millimeter-wave (mmWave) communication with sufficient spectral resources promises significant enhancement to satellite-terrestrial link capacity. However, the alignment delay and mutual interference caused by directional communications with narrow beams severely limit the capacity of mmWave communication. To this end, we optimize the beamwidth to reduce the impact of beam alignment overhead on capacity. Then, considering the multi-user interference between beams, we propose a transmission scheduling scheme based on beam sharing, namely users with strong mutual interference when served simultaneously by independent beams, share the same beam. A heuristic algorithm is proposed to derive the groups of users sharing beams, and their beamwidth. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme achieves considerable capacity enhancement compared to the one-to-one beam occupation scheme (OB) and fixed beam scheme (FB), thus improving the spectrum efficiency of mmWave satellite-terrestrial communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207