Dynamic Interference Analysis of Coexisting Mobile WBANs for Health Monitoring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) technology jumps into popularity owing to its real-time ability and high reliability in health monitoring. The accompanying interference problem must be highly concerned in coexisting densely deployed WBANs since the inter-WBAN interference results in high delay and low reliability data transmissions, especially with the movement of human body. In the paper, we analyze the dynamic interference with human mobility in multiple coexisting WBANs with the consideration of different distances between inter-WBANs and varying number of coexisting WBANs. Moreover, we investigate the influence of inter- WBAN interference on the performance of normalized throughput and average access delay of different traffic types. The results show that the interference generated by mobile neighbour WBANs extremely decreases the throughput of the target WBAN and increases the average packet delay 1.76 times of emergency data compared with the target WBAN without interference. The dynamic interference analysis provides insights on the practical WBAN management and interference mitigation protocol design, especially for the deeply deployed coexisting WBAN scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it