MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886387197 · doi:10.1086/699739

Purple Loosestrife Provides Long-Distance Pollinator Attraction to a Coflowering Native Species

2018· article· en· W2886387197 on OpenAlexafffund
Adam F. Groulx, Risa D. Sargent

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Plant Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPollinatorBiologyAttractionBotanyIntroduced speciesPollinationPollen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premise of research. The ecological impacts of invasive species on native ecosystems is a topic of intense debate. Recent reviews and meta-analyses have cast doubt on the long-held idea that the impacts of invasive species are universally negative. This may be particularly true in the case of plant-pollinator interactions. Here we describe a field experiment designed to assess the impact of an invasive species, Lythrum salicaria, on pollinator visitation to a commonly co-occurring native, Decodon verticillatus.Methodology. While controlling for total inflorescence density, we manipulated the presence of an invasive species, L. salicaria, at paired quadrats across several sites using a randomized block design. Data on the number, behavior, and taxon of pollinators visiting the quadrats were recorded during a series of observations spanning several days. Using linear models and paired t-tests, we analyzed the impact of the presence of the invasive species on the number of pollinators visiting D. verticillatus along with their visitation behavior in the quadrats.Pivotal results. The presence of L. salicaria was associated with significantly more pollinator visitors to a quadrat, both total visitors, and visitors to the native D. verticillatus.Conclusions. Our findings support the hypothesis that L. salicaria operates as a pollinator magnet and may in fact facilitate the long-distance attraction of pollinators to D. verticillatus in invaded communities. While this increase in visitation most likely has a positive impact on pollination of D. verticillatus, we note that the change in visitation may have negative implications for other animal-pollinated species in the vicinity. Our findings highlight the complexity and unpredictability of interactions among invasive and native species and help improve our understanding of how invasive species alter the short- and long-term dynamics of native plant and pollinator communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Plant SciencesSame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207