MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886470805 · doi:10.1101/384479

Single-nucleus RNA sequencing shows convergent evidence from different cell types for altered synaptic plasticity in major depressive disorder

2018· preprint· en· W2886470805 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Corina Nagy, Malosree Maitra, Arnaud Tanti, Matthew Suderman, Jean‐François Théroux, Naguib Mechawar, Jiannis Ragoussis, Gustavo Turecki

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionMcGill University
KeywordsTranscriptomeBiologyDorsolateral prefrontal cortexNeurosciencePhenotypeContext (archaeology)Prefrontal cortexSynaptic plasticityGeneNeuroplasticityGene expressionMajor depressive disorderCell typeCellGeneticsCognitionReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex illness that involves the interaction of different brain systems, pathways, and cell types. Past molecular studies of MDD relied on cellular homogenates of post-mortem brain tissue, making it impossible to determine gene expression changes within individual cells. Using single-cell transcriptomics, we examined almost 80,000 nuclei from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of individuals with MDD and healthy controls. Our analyses identified 26 distinct cellular clusters, and over 60% of these showed transcriptional differences between groups. Specifically, 96 genes were differentially expressed, the majority of which were downregulated. Convergent evidence from our analyses, including gene expression, differential correlation, and gene ontology implicated dysregulation of synaptic plasticity in the etiopathogenesis of MDD. Our results show that this high-resolution approach can reveal previously undetectable changes in specific cell types in the context of complex phenotypes and heterogeneous tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207