MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Multiscale Model to Incorporate Texture Evolution into Phenomenological Plasticity Models

2018· article· en· W2886500656 on OpenAlexaff
CP Kohar, JL Bassani, R. K. Mishra, Kaan Inal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenomenological modelMicromechanicsPlasticityTexture (cosmology)Crystal plasticityMaterials scienceDeformation (meteorology)Statistical physicsFlow (mathematics)MechanicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCondensed matter physicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crystal plasticity is a micromechanics-based model that is regularly used to simulate plastic spin during large deformation. Although crystal plasticity can provide an accurate description of local deformation behaviour, it is often computationally expensive and usually replaced by flow rule-based phenomenological models that do not capture this phenomenon. This work presents a phenomenological-based texture evolution (PBTE) model that allows for the enhancement of flow rule-based models to capture microstructural spin in a phenomenological manner. A numerical framework is presented for generating and calibrating the microstructural evolution for the PBTE model using crystal plasticity. The PBTE Model is calibrated and employed to predict the macroscopic mechanical response and the generated microstructural spin for single crystal FCC cube during non-proportional strain paths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicMetal Forming Simulation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207