MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886501613 · doi:10.11159/mmme18.104

Study on Calculation Method of Negative Pressure Loss Considering the Deformation of Drainage Borehole

2018· article· en· W2886501613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersState Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas ControlNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBoreholeDrainageGeologyDeformation (meteorology)Geotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The experimental system for borehole negative pressure distribution and flow distribution was constructed. The laws of borehole negative pressure distribution and flow distribution under different negative pressure conditions with consideration of borehole deformation were obtained. The theory of calculating borehole negative pressure loss was analyzed. A negative pressure loss calculation method with consideration of borehole deformation was proposed based on experimental measured results, and its validity was verified comparing the results calculated by proposed method and experimental measured results. Results show that: 1) The negative pressure loss for complete hole is relatively small, the negative pressures at different parts of borehole are similar with each other, and the borehole extraction flow is approximately in a linear distribution along borehole length direction. The larger the orifice pressure is, the larger the borehole extraction flow is, and the larger the borehole negative pressure loss is (it is worth noting that borehole negative pressure is still much smaller than orifice pressure). 2) In the case of hole-bottom collapse, the negative pressure loss in the collapse section is larger than that in complete section. Since the flow in the collapse section is small, its negative pressure loss is small as well. The total negative pressure loss upon hole collapse is larger than that in complete hole, while its total extraction flow is slightly smaller than that of complete hole. The hole-bottom collapse does not significantly affect the gas extraction performance. 3) The negative pressure loss results, which is calculated by the proposed method based on the consideration of borehole deformation, are consistent with the experiment results. Therefore, the proposed method can be used to calculate the negative pressure loss of extraction borehole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it