A Comparison of Safety Climate and Safety Performance between Ontario’s Residential and Heavy Civil Construction Sectors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Between 2013 and 2016 in the Province of Ontario, Canada, 739 surveys were collected from 70 residential construction sites, and 342 surveys were collected from 34 heavy civil construction sites. Safety climate and safety performance of these two sectors were compared. Overall, residential respondents reported slightly more safety incidents than heavy civil sites but they had very similar safety climate scores. For both sector respondents, “cut/puncture,” “strains/sprains.” “headache/dizziness,” and “persistent fatigue” are the most frequently experienced physical injuries; “slip/trip/fall on same level,” “exposure to chemicals,” and “overexertion while handling/lifting/carrying” are the most frequently experienced unsafe events. The role of management and supervisor safety commitment in improving safety and the impact of work pressure on physical safety outcomes and job stress are highlighted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it