MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886520557 · doi:10.1111/jre.12595

Morphological characterization of para‐ and proinflammatory neutrophil phenotypes using transmission electron microscopy

2018· article· en· W2886520557 on OpenAlexafffund
Alon Borenstein, Noah Fine, Siavash Hassanpour, Chunxiang Sun, Morvarid Oveisi, Howard C. Tenenbaum, Michael Glogauer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Periodontal Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsProinflammatory cytokinePeriodontitisImmunologyNeutrophil extracellular trapsInflammationBiologyPhagosomeImmune systemSalivaPathologyMicrobiologyChemistryMedicinePhagocytosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bacterial challenge is constant in the oral cavity. To contain the commensal biofilm, partly activated neutrophils are continuously recruited as part of a normal physiologic process, without exposing the host to the harmful effect of a fully active neutrophil response. This intermediate immune state has been termed para-inflammation, as opposed to the fully activated proinflammatory state in oral disease. Directly visualizing these cells and their components via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) enhances our understanding of neutrophil activation state differences in oral health and disease, as obtained from molecular studies. The aim of this study was to describe the morphology of the para-inflammatory phenotype displayed by oral neutrophils in health, and compare it to the morphology of the naïve blood neutrophil, and the proinflammatory oral neutrophils in chronic periodontitis. This morphology was characterized by differences in granule content, phagosome content and cytoplasm and nuclear changes. We also examined the morphological changes induced in naïve neutrophils, which were stimulated in vitro by bacteria, and in oral neutrophils in full tissue samples in vivo. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Neutrophils were isolated from blood and saliva samples of patients with chronic periodontitis and healthy individuals. The cells were viewed under TEM and analyzed in imaging software examining granularity, cytoplasm density, euchromatin amount in the nucleus and phagosome content. A separate cohort of blood neutrophils was incubated with Streptococcus oralis and analyzed under TEM in the same manner. Gingival tissue samples were obtained from patients with chronic periodontitis and viewed under TEM, with the neutrophils present analyzed in the same manner. RESULTS: The proinflammatory cells showed less granulation, lighter cytoplasm and higher amount of nuclear euchromatin. These changes were accentuated in the proinflammatory oral chronic periodontitis neutrophils compared to the para-inflammatory oral health neutrophils. The oral chronic periodontitis neutrophils also contained more phagosomes and had more phagosomes containing undigested bacteria. These changes were partially reproduced in the naïve blood cells after exposing them to S. oralis. The neutrophils in the gingival tissues displayed naïve morphology when viewed in the blood vessels and gradually showed proinflammatory morphological changes as they traveled through the connective tissue into the epithelium. CONCLUSION: Oral neutrophils display morphological changes consistent with partial or full activation, corresponding to their para- or proinflammatory states. These changes can also be induced in naïve cells by incubating them with commensal bacteria. Neutrophils change their morphology towards an activated state as they travel through the gingival tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Periodontal ResearchSame topicOral microbiology and periodontitis researchFrench-language works237,207