gpGrouper: A Peptide Grouping Algorithm for Gene-Centric Inference and Quantitation of Bottom-Up Proteomics Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In quantitative mass spectrometry, the method by which peptides are grouped into proteins can have dramatic effects on downstream analyses. Here we describe gpGrouper, an inference and quantitation algorithm that offers an alternative method for assignment of protein groups by gene locus and improves pseudo-absolute iBAQ quantitation by weighted distribution of shared peptide areas. We experimentally show that distributing shared peptide quantities based on unique peptide peak ratios improves quantitation accuracy compared with conventional winner-take-all scenarios. Furthermore, gpGrouper seamlessly handles two-species samples such as patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) without ignoring the host species or species-shared peptides. This is a critical capability for proper evaluation of proteomics data from PDX samples, where stromal infiltration varies across individual tumors. Finally, gpGrouper calculates peptide peak area (MS1) based expression estimates from multiplexed isobaric data, producing iBAQ results that are directly comparable across label-free, isotopic, and isobaric proteomics approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it