MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886703143 · doi:10.14510/araj.2017.4130

NATIONAL GHG EMISSIONS PROJECTIONS FROM INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES – METAL INDUSTRY

2017· article· en· W2886703143 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Iulia Mircea, Mihaela Bălănescu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Romanian Academy of Arts and Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Policies and Emissions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitatea Politehnica Timisoara
KeywordsGreenhouse gasEnvironmental scienceNatural resource economicsBusinessWaste managementEngineeringEconomicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The EU ETS is a policy tool used to promote investment in clean, low-carbon technologies and has placed climate change on the companies' agenda, by putting a price on carbon. The EU ETS cap and trade concept were the first policy tool used and implemented in the world for the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). Metals process sector is the largest industrial source of greenhouse gases, with steel as the main culprit. Traditional methods of extracting iron from it or require a carbon-based reductant produce large quantities of CO2. The proposed methodology for achieving emission forecasts for GHG emissions is based on historical data from the National Emissions Inventory (NIGHGE) between 1989 -2015, and, on the forecasts of macroeconomic indicators considered in the strategies of the Romanian Government and policies adopted for the economic and social development of the country. In the paper one analyzes the GHG emissions from industrial processes for Romanian for iron and steel sector and GHG emissions projections for this sector until 2035 will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Romanian Academy of Arts and SciencesSame topicEnvironmental Policies and EmissionsFrench-language works237,207