MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886708789 · doi:10.7202/1050507ar

Les voyages des manuscrits de la mer Morte

2018· article· fr· W2886708789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis la découverte des premiers rouleaux de parchemin en 1947, les Manuscrits de la mer Morte ont fait l’objet de nombreuses querelles non seulement d’ordre théologique et archéologique, mais également d’ordre culturel, politique et juridique. Actuellement détenus en grande majorité par Israël, ces Manuscrits sont désormais au coeur de revendications concurrentes dans la mesure où tant Israël que la Jordanie et l’Autorité palestinienne en réclament la propriété. Dans cette perspective, le présent article se propose non seulement d’explorer les enjeux juridiques soulevés par la question de la propriété des Manuscrits de la mer Morte, plus spécifiquement ce qui a trait aux normes de droit international, mais également de mettre en lumière la manière dont les questions relatives au patrimoine culturel et religieux conservent une dimension hautement politique du fait de l’implication des États dans la protection de ces biens, et de la notion de territoire qu’elle implique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it