MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886710034 · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2018.07.013

Combined Therapy in Cancer: The Non-coding Approach

2018· article· en· W2886710034 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Diana Gulei, Ioana Berindan‐Neagoe

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTerry Fox Foundation
KeywordsmicroRNADiseasesortFunction (biology)Coding (social sciences)CancerComputational biologyMedicineBioinformaticsBiologyGeneComputer scienceGeneticsInternal medicineInformation retrievalSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the fact that the idea of personalized medicine in cancer has been accentuated in the last years of research, this concept is well rooted in the history of medicine: “It is more important to know what sort of person has a disease than to know what sort of disease a person has” (Hippocrates 450–370 BCE). We understood that the right therapy has to be administrated in the right amount, to the right patient, under the right conditions, and finally at the right time. But what if the safe amount is not necessarily the most effective one? In light of these aspects, researchers have developed combinatorial strategies of anti-cancer drugs to avoid a heavy insult in terms of toxicity and also installation of drug resistance. The question that arises at this moment is: how do we deal with the last generation forms of therapy in the name of microRNA (miRNA) modulation? miRNAs are short non-coding sequences that impair the expression of specific genes mainly by targeting the complementary transcript. The panel of targeted transcripts is now made available through a wide selection of databases that comprise the experimental validation of the interactions and also the predicted ones (e.g. miRWalk1Dweep H. Gretz N. Sticht C. miRWalk database for miRNA-target interactions.Methods Mol. Biol. 2014; 1182: 289-305Crossref PubMed Scopus (212) Google Scholar). Although this vast network of regulation is responsible for the normal function of numerous pathways inside the cell, the aberrant expression of miRNAs is becoming a central part in cancer initiation and development. We are currently aware that these small transcripts are involved in every cancer hallmark mainly through downregulated profiles for the tumor suppressor miRNAs and exacerbated expression for the oncogenic ones. These aspects were discussed over and over in the last years in the scientific literature and numerous proposals with miRNAs as therapeutic agents were published in the oncological domain.2Peng Y. Croce C.M. The role of MicroRNAs in human cancer.Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2016; 1: 15004Crossref PubMed Scopus (1270) Google Scholar, 3Berindan-Neagoe I. Monroig Pdel.C. Pasculli B. Calin G.A. MicroRNAome genome: a treasure for cancer diagnosis and therapy.CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014; 64: 311-336Crossref PubMed Scopus (417) Google Scholar, 4Braicu C. Calin G.A. Berindan-Neagoe I. MicroRNAs and cancer therapy - from bystanders to major players.Curr. Med. Chem. 2013; 20: 3561-3573Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar, 5Gulei D. Mehterov N. Nabavi S.M. Atanasov A.G. Berindan-Neagoe I. Targeting ncRNAs by plant secondary metabolites: The ncRNAs game in the balance towards malignancy inhibition.Biotechnol. Adv. 2017; (Published online November 10, 2017)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.11.003Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar, 6Redis R.S. Berindan-Neagoe I. Pop V.I. Calin G.A. Non-coding RNAs as theranostics in human cancers.J. Cell. Biochem. 2012; 113: 1451-1459PubMed Google Scholar, 7Braicu C. Catana C. Calin G.A. Berindan-Neagoe I. NCRNA combined therapy as future treatment option for cancer.Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014; 20: 6565-6574Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar However, considering the complex scheme behind miRNA signaling, where the targeting takes place in a multicoordinated system—one miRNA can target multiple transcripts and one transcript can be targeted by more than one miRNA—the following statement becomes plausible: one single miRNA sequence, despite the extended role throughout entire signaling pathways, is not able to hazardously disrupt the development of cancer cells and completely eradicate the pathology within the organism in safe administrated doses. This affirmation comes from the idea that a tumor suppressor gene could be experimentally enforced through downregulation of an oncogenic complementary miRNA, but this is not necessarily a secure strategy considering that there are other miRNAs that can still target the same transcript. Still, the same miRNA can simultaneously target tumor suppressor and oncogenic genes in context-dependent situations, weakening the treatment efficiency or, even worse, producing long-term side effects. Moreover, the ability of cancer cells to develop compensatory mechanism by activating bypassing systems is also affecting the possibility of using miRNAs as single agents in preclinical and/or clinical therapeutics. The first clinical trial involving the experimental upregulation of miR-34 has underlined important safety aspects regarding this type of therapeutic approach and urged the need for other perspectives. To obtain a superior yield in terms of cancer therapy, we are proposing a novel kind of approach where miRNA modulation could be used as the first line of treatment to disrupt the cancer cell at multiple levels, followed by administration of small molecule inhibitors for specific cancer-driven targets in the attempt to obtain a superior effect at lower doses. This approach has a molecular level of action for both therapeutic molecules, where the suppression of a specific target by a small molecule inhibitor could be sustained by a synergistic miRNA concentrated on the same oncogenic pathway. Moreover, the ability of miRNAs to modulate multiple transcripts from the same or interconnected molecular mechanisms (e.g. apoptosis, epithelial to mesenchymal transition [EMT], angiogenesis, etc.) represents a steady advantage,8Berindan-Neagoe I. Calin G.A. Molecular pathways: microRNAs, cancer cells, and microenvironment.Clin. Cancer Res. 2014; 20: 6247-6253Crossref PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar, 9Gulei D. Mehterov N. Ling H. Stanta G. Braicu C. Berindan-Neagoe I. The “good-cop bad-cop” TGF-beta role in breast cancer modulated by non-coding RNAs.Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2017; 1861: 1661-1675Crossref PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar, 10Gulei D. Magdo L. Jurj A. Raduly L. Cojocneanu-Petric R. Moldovan A. Moldovan C. Florea A. Pasca S. Pop L.A. et al.The silent healer: miR-205-5p up-regulation inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition in colon cancer cells by indirectly up-regulating E-cadherin expression.Cell Death Dis. 2018; 9: 66Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar where the effect of miRNA will be perceived at a more general level and the small molecule will strongly attack the principal knot from the altered oncogenic pathway (the principal knot is considered a molecule that is strongly overexpressed and functional within a oncogenic pathway; the principal knot can also be cancer specific). In this way, the tendency of cancer cells to overcome the impairing effects through activation of adaptive loops will be hampered by a well-chosen non-coding sequence able to modulate targets that could be used by malignant cells for activation of secondary paths. Importantly, the chosen signaling knot (referred to as the main targeted oncogenic molecule) will be inhibited by both agents to obtain a maximum impairing effect with smaller doses. In this way, the potential toxicity and implicit side effects will be strongly diminished, preserving or even improving the malignant inhibitory effect. In general terms, the exogenous miRNA is used for weakening of cancer cell due to its ability to target multiple transcripts, where the second line of treatment is used as a powerful targeted agent able to eradicate the cancer cell through different mechanisms (e.g. apoptosis, inhibition of cell cycle, necrosis, etc). The effect of the second therapeutic will be significantly improved due to the already weak malignant phenotype obtained after the restoration of a specific miRNA expression. This approach represents a novel perspective upon miRNA therapeutics, where the non-coding sequence is not the central part of the treatment scheme, but is contributing to the efficiency of the second type of therapy. Despite the fact that the proposed molecule for the second administration consists in a specific small molecule inhibitor, there is the possibility to replace this one with other types of therapies, even with the classical chemotherapy. One of the marked points in molecular oncology consists of the implementation of non-coding RNA sequences, partially represented by miRNAs, as important influencers of cancer-related pathways.3Berindan-Neagoe I. Monroig Pdel.C. Pasculli B. Calin G.A. MicroRNAome genome: a treasure for cancer diagnosis and therapy.CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014; 64: 311-336Crossref PubMed Scopus (417) Google Scholar Despite numerous research conducted on this type of therapy,11Christopher A.F. Kaur R.P. Kaur G. Kaur A. Gupta V. Bansal P. MicroRNA therapeutics: Discovering novel targets and developing specific therapy.Perspect. Clin. Res. 2016; 7: 68-74Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 12Chakraborty C. Sharma A.R. Sharma G. Doss C.G.P. Lee S.S. Therapeutic miRNA and siRNA: Moving from Bench to Clinic as Next Generation Medicine.Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2017; 8: 132-143Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (515) Google Scholar, 13Shah M.Y. Ferrajoli A. Sood A.K. Lopez-Berestein G. Calin G.A. microRNA Therapeutics in Cancer - An Emerging Concept.EBioMedicine. 2016; 12: 34-42Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (305) Google Scholar there are still major concerns related to the actual clinical effects of miRNA modulation. As is the case of any other drug, there is the need for numerous optimization protocols in order to reduce the unwanted effects and potentiate the beneficial one. Several issues related to delivery platforms—optimal dosage, unwanted toxicity, and achieving targeted administration—are still the subjects of intense studies.14Brown R.A.M. Richardson K.L. Kalinowski F.C. Epis M.R. Horsham J.L. Kabir T.D. De Pinho M.H. Beveridge D.J. Stuart L.M. Wintle L.C. Leedman P.J. Evaluation of MicroRNA Delivery In Vivo.Methods Mol. Biol. 2018; 1699: 155-178Crossref PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar, 15Chen Y. Gao D.Y. Huang L. In vivo delivery of miRNAs for cancer therapy: challenges and strategies.Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015; 81: 128-141Crossref PubMed Scopus (450) Google Scholar One particular situation that is quite specific for non-coding oligonucleotides-based therapies is that, compared to the usual situation, where one main target is affected, miRNAs influence numerous elements within the cell, and the assessment of the specific downstream effect becomes much more difficult to evaluate. In the moment of increased administration, when the dose is being pushed to the highest levels to obtain a clear effect, the risk of unwanted targeting is clearly potentiated. This type of toxicity is primarily divided into two categories: hybridization dependent and hybridization independent (or chemistry-related effects). For the first category, it is possible to force the modulation of the targeted genes by administering excess therapeutic compound (exaggerated pharmacology) or to determine off-target effects caused by unspecific binding. For the last case, there is also the possibility of saturation concept, when the exogenous sequence is administrated in doses that exceed the amount of target sequences present in the malignant cell and, in this way, the probability of off-target effects is majorly increased. The second primary category, chemistry-related effects, generally refers to the structure of the miRNA sequence and the biological effects that are unrelated to the hybridization action. Importantly, like any other DNA- or RNA-based regimens, miRNA therapeutics can induce an innate immune response that will trigger an entire cascade of pro-inflammatory events. Nevertheless, another important aspect—secondary related to toxicology—consists of the gradual aspects of the therapeutic efficiency, where miRNAs act on primary targets that, in their turn, modulate downstream effectors. Considering that the sum of the pharmacological effects over time is able to cause a change in the disease phenotype establishes the pharmacological activity of a compound, it is highly possible that the immediate effect observed after miRNA exogenous expression or inhibition is not completely underlying the overall preclinical or clinical changes. This is actually a crucial issue in managing the dose of administrated miRNA compound, where a specific amount of inhibitor or mimic can cause a certain effect at the present time, an effect that can be potentiated afterwards, revealing supplementary toxicity.11Christopher A.F. Kaur R.P. Kaur G. Kaur A. Gupta V. Bansal P. MicroRNA therapeutics: Discovering novel targets and developing specific therapy.Perspect. Clin. Res. 2016; 7: 68-74Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 16van Rooij E. Purcell A.L. Levin A.A. Developing microRNA therapeutics.Circ. Res. 2012; 110: 496-507Crossref PubMed Scopus (416) Google Scholar In light of these aspects, it is crucially important to manage the doses of administrated miRNA therapeutics at highly specific levels and not lose sight of the potential side effects in favor of the beneficial and prominent ones. The switch from chemotherapy to molecular targeted agents has been implemented already in the oncological field with several successful cases: anti-estrogens and anti-androgens for the curative management of hormone driven breast and prostate cancer, all trans retinoic acid for acute promyelocytic leukemia patients that present translocation in the retinoic acid and for L. of retinoic acid in the treatment of acute promyelocytic PubMed Google Scholar, I. A. et compared with and for J. Med. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. P. of small molecule cancer challenges and 2012; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar The efficiency of these small molecule inhibitors the for other potential therapeutics with mechanisms of action but concentrated on altered within the targeted is now clear that we the of and this concept is its within the clinical The switch from the classical of chemotherapy to targeted agents and small molecule in cancer treatment has the for several types of oncological for leukemia and and in the of breast and cell affecting specific that to the of cancer cells, in with the general on cells of the regimens, targeted agents have to the and also supplementary for patients with due to toxicity and improved J. E. S. S. et chemotherapy for breast J. Med. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, a generation of cancer Google Scholar, R. C. An of targeted in Ther. Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar However, there are also that need to be overcome in order to the most of this One issue to the of cancer cells, the where the of a cancer cell is not necessarily to the and implicit phenotype of another cell within the same malignant M.R. and the of cancer J. Med. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, for cancer Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar, D. The of personalized cancer medicine: underlying hallmark 2012; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar In this way, cells could in a different to the activity of the small molecule inhibitor in one particular case, the inhibitory agent is and, in the other case, the effect is or major issue is drug where the cell can to the action of the small molecule inhibitor through activation of S. E. J. S. N. inhibition regulation of 1: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar or signaling C.M. L. L.A. C.M. N. J. et to inhibition through pathway PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R. H. Lee H. Lee N. H. et to inhibition by or PubMed Scopus Google Scholar there is the possibility of within the target and implicit the small molecule inhibitor and S. H. J. A. The and of The 2012; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar are also issues related to this type of strategy in cancer as the of malignant driven targets that, will determine a prominent of and also research and clinical In light of the discussed aspects, we are proposing a novel type of combined therapy by the effects of miRNA inhibition or with the action of small molecule inhibitors to obtain a superior inhibitory effect upon cancer possible therapeutic for different signaling within cancer cells, on combinatorial strategies miRNAs and small The proposed idea consists of administration of miRNA inhibitors or to small molecule inhibitors to an for the specific activity of the second In this way, the non-coding sequence will target the central knot targeted by the small molecule but will also the levels of transcripts involved in the same pathway and other signaling in drug due to the of targeted The role of miRNA is to the field for the effect of the small molecule inhibitor, weakening the cancer cells at multiple this administration, the second agent targeted the same central oncogenic molecule will the line of treatment in terms of cancer The sequence of where miRNA is as a first is chosen in favor of the other administration or second line of the ability of miRNAs to target multiple oncogenic targets at will be used to the malignant cell, its ability to through compensatory and the efficiency of the small molecule this type of combined the like with therapeutic effects and also drug could be strongly crucial is also represented by the administrated where the amount of drugs for both type of agents will be significantly with the of toxicity events. We the of miRNA mimic or inhibitor doses in this particular case, the dose can be lower than the maximum Considering the fact that the role of miRNA is to the cancer cells and the field for the action of the small molecule inhibitor, the doses will be lower than the ones used in the miRNA approach is not followed by the of a effect, but a The of in vivo for the of toxicity with miRNA treatment is currently a the dose of miRNA mimic or inhibitor that has a effect in with a small molecule inhibitor is the potential toxicity has to be followed throughout a in that the of immune The of the dose to be by of a wide of treatment in where at two will be in for malignant inhibition to the dose with an actual effect. Moreover, toxicity need to be for miRNA and small molecule inhibitor as single agents and in to the of Importantly, the possible side effects due to the action of miRNAs are also in the case of a lower the is also a crucial issue for of side effects. is related to the action of the small molecule inhibitor, these agents are not as specific as type of targeted and generally the activity of (e.g. the administrated and also the compared to other forms of targeted therapies are their possible in a generation of cancer Google Scholar by the of the cancer cells through miRNA administration, the dose of small molecule inhibitor can also be with regarding the of off-target effects upon cells part of malignant specific targeted by small molecule it is that the agent will the cell most in the complementary doses also of agent that can attack also that there are small able to modulate the expression of miRNAs by targeting the sequence or Pdel.C. L. S. Calin G.A. molecule targeting miRNAs for cancer Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015; 81: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar One strategy is the idea of with the proposed strategy by using small molecule inhibitors able to modulate miRNAs levels and central oncogenic within the targeted However, within this kind of the of the levels of miRNA becomes more difficult due to the action of the small molecule Moreover, the of the proposed strategy is the ability to significantly smaller doses of exogenous miRNAs for the of cancer cells not of a small molecule in doses to a level of the targeted In one of we that is downregulated in colon cancer patients and cells, with a inhibition ability upon in turn, inhibits the levels of a epithelial with the of cells as downregulated in the same is able to the of in colon cancer by of expression and upregulation of as in D. Magdo L. Jurj A. Raduly L. Cojocneanu-Petric R. Moldovan A. Moldovan C. Florea A. Pasca S. Pop L.A. et al.The silent healer: miR-205-5p up-regulation inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition in colon cancer cells by indirectly up-regulating E-cadherin expression.Cell Death Dis. 2018; 9: 66Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar as a the a central molecule for that the of for the of cancer cells and also for the of the mesenchymal A. H. A. A.K. role of in and of Mol. 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar as in cancer with with disease and D. Y. of and in with clinical and 9: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar Therapeutic upregulation of could be followed by administration of a small molecule inhibitor for its ability to tumor S. J. in PubMed Scopus Google gene with and ability to modulate and cancer the transition of human Biol. Cell. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Y. H. S. S. J. both transition and cell in human epithelial cells by Res. PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar, L. Y. J.L. H. et transition by upregulation of Res. 2012; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar is also overexpressed in A. R. M.H. expression of tumor with cancer J. 2014; 20: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar Moreover, is an compound that and the action of E. J. is an inhibitor of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar the revealing the of this miRNA to influence numerous pathways within cancer cells, through but also to target simultaneously tumor suppressor genes like the idea of using miRNA in doses to induce a within the cell becomes even more into the multiple targets but also the of the targets in terms of oncogenic or tumor suppressor the and in the field of cancer will in an of with numerous miRNAs proposed for therapeutic regarding inhibition of The classical approach consists of the modulation of a single miRNA sequence to the expression of a specific target gene and multiple ones to trigger a mechanism for cancer This modulation has been proposed even with the administration of small molecule inhibitors able to modulate the expression of or in with the actual D. A.K. targeting microRNA for cancer therapy: and 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C. L. L. Delivery of and to in by using Chem. 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar But is this strategy to in actual Considering the of cancer, the of miRNAs that are actually in malignant cells, and the ability of cancer cells to develop compensatory mechanisms to avoid the therapeutic we need to another approach to the of miRNA therapeutics. In this the could be represented by the implementation of strategies where miRNAs are used as of cancer cells and the malignant more weak and for the line of This approach the administration of significantly the possible secondary and effects and also the ones that are still in the case of Moreover, the efficiency of the second treatment will significantly even in the case of due to the ability of miRNAs to target multiple genes and to a certain the in the the experimental of the miRNAs and small molecule inhibitors can also be to several preclinical The consists mainly in the of the therapeutic where side effects with both miRNA and small molecule inhibitors need to be and, more in and the concept of the present the and improved the The have of This is part of the systems for cancer diagnosis and on in the clinical research and of to chemotherapy and overall in colon from the with

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Therapy — Nucleic AcidsSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207