Abstract CT053: Preliminary safety, efficacy, and PK/PD characterization from GARNET, a phase 1 clinical trial of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, TSR-042, in patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC and MSI-H endometrial cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: TSR-042 is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death (PD)-1, effectively blocking interaction with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. TSR-042 is being evaluated in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors in the ongoing phase 1 GARNET trial (NCT02715284). Weight based dose escalation (Part 1) and fixed-dose safety studies (Part 2A) have been completed,1 and the study is currently enrolling pts with specific tumor types into expansion cohorts. Here, we present safety and efficacy data from the microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) endometrial cancer (EC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohorts, as well as pharmacokinetic (PK) and receptor occupancy (RO) characterization at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Methods/Procedures: 30 NSCLC pts and 19 MSI-H EC pts with previously treated recurrent or advanced disease were enrolled; median number of prior lines of therapy for metastatic disease was 1.0 for both cohorts. MSI status for EC pts was determined centrally using a next generation sequencing-based assay. Key exclusion criteria included prior therapy with agents targeting anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or PD-L2, and uncontrolled CNS metastases. Pts were treated at the R2PD of TSR-042: 500 mg Q3W for the first 4 cycles and 1000 mg Q6W thereafter. Serum and PBMCs were collected for PK and RO analyses, respectively. Antitumor activity was assessed by investigators using immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST). RO was assessed using a CD3+ binding assay (direct receptor occupancy).1 Results: Among the 30 NSCLC and 19 MSI-H EC pts, 42 (85.7%) pts reported ≥1 adverse event (AE), with grade ≥3 AEs reported in 13/49 (26.5%) pts. The most common AEs were diarrhea and nausea (11 pts each), arthralgia and fatigue (9 pts each), and cough, decreased appetite, and dyspnea (7 pts each). 25/49 (51.0%) pts reported treatment-related AEs; 11/49 (22.4%) pts had serious AEs; 1 case of grade 3 fatigue and 1 case of grade 3 leukopenia and grade 3 neutropenia were deemed treatment-related. 21 NSCLC and 11 MSI-H EC pts had at least 1 tumor assessment. Among NSCLC pts, 7/21 (33.3%) had a partial response (irPR; confirmed and unconfirmed), and 6/21 (28.6%) had stable disease (irSD); among MSI-H EC pts, 4/11 (36.4%) had irPR, and 2/11 (18.2%) had irSD. TSR-042 demonstrated dose-proportional PK. The maximal achievable RO was observed in pts treated at the RP2D, consistent with the results reported for Parts 1 and 2A.1 Conclusions: These results indicate clinical benefit of TSR-042 in previously treated NSCLC and MSI-H EC patients, with a safety profile similar to other PD-1 inhibitors. PK results were consistent across all patients evaluated and show that maximal achievable receptor occupancy was attained at the RP2D. 1. Sachdev JC et al. Ann Oncol. 2017(suppl 5):28:420;1185P Citation Format: Victor Moreno, Maria-Pilar Barretina-Ginesta, Wei Guo, Sharon Lu, David Jenkins, Kristen McEachern, Vienna Reichert, Steven Dunlap, Ellie Im, Lucy Gilbert, Ana Oaknin, Charles Leath, III, Janakiraman Subramanian. Preliminary safety, efficacy, and PK/PD characterization from GARNET, a phase 1 clinical trial of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, TSR-042, in patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC and MSI-H endometrial cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT053.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".