MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2886741180 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-516

Abstract 516: Long noncoding RNA NEAT1 promotes lung metastasis of soft tissue sarcoma

2018· article· en· W2886741180 on OpenAlexaff
Jianguo Huang, Eric S. Xu, Mohit Sachdeva, Timothy J. Robinson, Xiaodi Qin, Dadong Zhang, Kouros Owzar, Nalan Gökgöz, Andrew Seto, Irene L. Andrulis, Jay S. Wunder, Tomoyo Okada, Samuel Singer, Alexander J. Lazar, Brian P. Rubin, David G. Kirsch

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKRASMetastasisLungSarcomaCancer researchPathologyPrimary tumorBiologyLong non-coding RNADownregulation and upregulationRNAIn situ hybridizationMedicineCancerGene expressionGeneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are malignant tumors from diverse mesenchymal tissues. About 40% STS patients develop fatal lung metastasis with a median survival of 15 months. The mechanisms driving the development of lung metastasis in sarcoma patients are poorly understood. Therefore, our lab has developed a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of high-grade primary STS with conditional mutations in Kras and Trp53 (KP) where 40% of mice tumors develop lung metastasis. This KP model recapitulates human patients with Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma (UPS), one of the most common subtypes of STS diagnosed in adults. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) was performed on paired primary and lung metastases in KP mouse sarcomas and determined that the expression of the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) Neat1 is increased in lung metastases compared to paired primary tumors. Real time PCR (qPCR) in 22 paired KP mouse primary sarcomas and lung metastases further confirmed that Neat1 is significantly upregulated in lung metastases. In addition, RNA-Seq data from 5 pairs of human primary sarcomas and matched lung metastases also showed that NEAT1 levels are increased in lung metastases. Furthermore, NEAT1 RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) on tissue microarrays (TMAs) of human primary UPS and lung metastases determined that the expression of NEAT1 is upregulated in lung metastases. Next, CRISPR/Cas9 technology was applied to delete Neat1 in primary mouse sarcoma cells and loss of expression of Neat1 was confirmed by qPCR and northern blot in knockout (KO) clones. In addition, loss of Neat1 significantly reduced lung metastasis in vivo following tail vein injection of these modified cells into nude mice. To further test that loss of Neat1 reduces lung metastasis in primary sarcoma mouse model, primary tumors with Neat1 deletion are generated in GEMMs using in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 technology and KrasLSL-G12D/+; Trp53Flox/Flox; Neat1-/- (KPN) mouse model. Finally, RNA-Seq and capture hybridization analysis of RNA targets (CHART) are performed to determine mechanisms by which Neat1 regulates lung metastasis. Overall, these results suggest that upregulation of Neat1 promotes lung metastasis of soft tissue sarcoma and NEAT1 is a potential target to prevent or treat lung metastasis in sarcoma patients. Citation Format: Jianguo Huang, Eric Xu, Mohit Sachdeva, Timothy Robinson, Xiaodi Qin, Dadong Zhang, Kouros Owzar, Nalan Gokgoz, Andrew Seto, Irene Andrulis, Jay Wunder, Tomoyo Okada, Samuel Singer, Alexander Lazar, Brian Rubin, David G. Kirsch. Long noncoding RNA NEAT1 promotes lung metastasis of soft tissue sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 516.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→