L’interface politico-administrative en Suisse : de la dépendance institutionnelle à une managérialisation progressive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’interface politico-administrative suisse doit beaucoup aux spécificités institutionnelles du régime politique. Un État fédéral bicaméral très décentralisé, fondé sur des institutions de démocratie directe, basé sur la recherche du consensus et sur l’intégration des parties prenantes dans la définition des politiques publiques sont des aspects qui conduisent à faire de l’acteur administratif un partenaire incontournable. Par ailleurs, la Suisse possède une tradition administrative largement hybride, laquelle est encadrée par des règles marquant son caractère très ouvert. Ces différentes dimensions, analysées dans le présent article, donnent à l’interface politico-administrative suisse une dynamique toute particulière, dont la régulation est en train de se modifier à la suite de la managérialisation progressive du système politico-administratif. Des évolutions récentes, dont les conséquences sont encore méconnues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".