Synthesis and Utilization of Low Dispersity Acrylic Macromonomer as Dispersant for Nonaqueous Dispersion Polymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of dispersity on the stabilization performance of poly(butyl methacrylate) (P(BMA)) ω-unsaturated macromonomer used as a reactive dispersant in nonaqueous acrylic dispersion (NAD) polymerization is investigated for the first time. Macromonomer with low dispersity (1.3) is synthesized in a one-pot process by the addition of bis(difluoroboryldiphenylglyoximato)cobalt(II) (CoPheBF) as a catalytic chain transfer (CCT) agent to P(BMA) chains mediated by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP); addition of the CoPheBF at a BMA monomer conversion of ∼80% leads to good control of chain length and dispersity while achieving a high fraction of terminal double bond (TDB) functionality. The lower dispersity P(BMA) macromonomer provides better stabilization to NAD systems per dispersant chain compared to material of the same number-average molecular weight (∼6000 Da) and TDB functionalization (∼70–75%) but higher dispersity (1.8), as characterized by the smaller average particle sizes and the higher weight fractions of incorporated dispersant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".