MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886884350 · doi:10.1109/smacd.2018.8434895

A Memristive TaOx-Based Median Filter Design for Image Processing Application

2018· article· en· W2886884350 on OpenAlexaff
Abubakr Sasi, Amirali Amirsoleimani, Majid Ahmadi, Arash Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedian filterComputer scienceSalt-and-pepper noiseNoise (video)Peak signal-to-noise ratioCadenceFilter (signal processing)PixelElectronic engineeringCMOSArtificial intelligenceFilter designImage processingAlgorithmComputer visionImage (mathematics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work manifests the implementation of mem-ristive 2-D median filter and extends previously published works on memristive filter design to include this emerging technology characteristics in image processing. The proposed circuit was designed based on Pt/TaOx/Ta redox-based device and Memristor Ratioed Logic (MRL). The proposed filter is designed in Cadence and the memristive median approved tested circuit is translated to Verilog-XL as a behavioral model. Different 512 × 512 pixels input images contain salt and pepper noise with various noise density ratios are applied to the proposed median filter and the design successfully has substantially removed the noise. In comparison with the conventional filters, it gives better Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for different images with different noise density ratios while it saves more area as compared to CMOS-based design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207