Study of Correction Maneuver for Lunar Flyby Transfers in the Real Ephemeris
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the trajectory correction maneuver (TCM) problem of several lunar flyby transfers is investigated in the ephemeris model. The error analysis indicates that the state error of a transfer orbit will be enlarged by lunar flyby; hence, a TCM must be executed before lunar flyby. A TCM approach based on the shooting method is proposed in the ephemeris model. This method is then applied to design the TCM of two kinds of lunar flyby transfers: transfers between the sun–Earth/moon libration point orbits, and transfers from the Earth to the sun–Earth/moon libration point orbits. Some regions with abnormally large fuel costs are found and explained by the numerical method. Furthermore, several TCM strategies of lunar flyby transfers under practical constraints are presented and discussed. Finally, the effect of the navigation errors on the TCM problem is investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it