MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2887007511 · doi:10.1158/1557-3265.ovca17-b39

Abstract B39: The origins of endometriosis-associated cancers

2018· article· en· W2887007511 on OpenAlexaff
Dawn R. Cochrane, Basile Tessier‐Cloutier, Katherine M. Lawrence, Tayyebeh M. Nazeran, Anthony N. Karnezis, Clara Salamanca, Timothy Lee, Angela Cheng, Jessica N. McAlpine, Lien Hoang, C. Blake Gilks, David Huntsman

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClear cellHistogenesisBiologyOvarian cancerClear cell carcinomaPathologyCell of originContext (archaeology)OvaryCancer researchEndometriosisCarcinomaCancerImmunohistochemistryEndocrinologyMedicineGeneticsImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Both clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) are associated with ovarian endometriotic cysts, which is believed to be the precursor lesion of these cancers. Women with endometriotic cysts have up to a 3-fold increased risk of developing CCOC and ENOC. It is perplexing that these two clinically distinct histotypes of ovarian cancer arise from the same precursor lesion. We have performed whole-genome sequencing of ovarian cancer histotypes and found that while some genomic features are more common to one histotype than the other, there is not a single feature that is unique to either histotype. Lacking genomic evidence that could explain the differences between these histotypes, we hypothesized that these cancers arise from distinct cells of origin within endometrial tissue, and the cellular context accounts for their differences. We performed global proteomic analysis of ovarian cancer histotypes and identified CTH as a marker for CCOC. Upon examination of normal Müllerian tissues, we found that CTH is highly expressed in the ciliated cells of endometrium (both ectopic endometrium and endometriosis) and of the fallopian tube, with very little expression in the secretory cells of these tissues. We also find that other ciliated cell markers are expressed in CCOC, whereas endometrial secretory cell markers are expressed in ENOC. We propose a new model of CCOC and ENOC histogenesis wherein ENOC is derived from cells of secretory cell lineage whereas CCOC is derived from, or shares similarities to, cells of ciliated cell lineage. There remain, however, many unanswered questions. For example, while CCOC and ENOC occur at roughly equal prevalence, ciliated cells of the endometrium are rare compared to secretory cells. Cells in the endometriotic cyst are exposed to factors such as inflammation and reactive oxygen species, which could influence differentiation of endometrial progenitor cells into the secretory or ciliated cell lineage. To test factors that promote ciliated cell differentiation in normal endometrium, we treated organoid cultures of normal endometrium with IL-6 and Notch pathway modulators. We propose that ovarian cancer histotypes arise from different cells of origin and that the biology of the normal cells will be partly responsible for determining the phenotype of the cancers. Citation Format: Dawn Cochrane, Basile Tessier-Cloutier, Katherine Lawrence, Tayyebeh Nazeran, Anthony Karnezis, Clara Salamanca, Timothy Lee, Angela Cheng, Jessica McAlpine, Lien Hoang, Blake Gilks, David Huntsman. The origins of endometriosis-associated cancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Conference: Addressing Critical Questions in Ovarian Cancer Research and Treatment; Oct 1-4, 2017; Pittsburgh, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(15_Suppl):Abstract nr B39.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.332
GPT teacher head0.583
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicEndometriosis Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→