Sécuritisation et construction d’un complexe de sécurité régional dans la Corne de l’Afrique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment se forment et se cristallisent les complexes de sécurité régionaux ( csr ) ? En 2003, B. Buzan et O. Waever avaient présenté la Corne de l’Afrique comme un proto- csr (après avoir été un pré-complexe pendant la guerre froide), mais ils n’avaient pas développé les outils analytiques permettant d’expliquer le passage à un csr à part entière. Nous montrons que l’émergence d’une puissance régionale, l’Éthiopie, joue un rôle essentiel dans la formation d’un csr . Cette puissance régionale devient un agent performatif des processus de sécuritisation. Cet article a une ambition empirique et théorique. D’une part, nous démontrons comment un double processus de sécuritisation – de la menace terroriste djihadiste dans la Corne entre 1998 et 2005 et de « l’État failli » somalien – a mené à l’intervention éthiopienne en 2006. Nous analysons ensuite l’aboutissement du csr .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".