ARCHÉOLOGIE ET MISE EN VALEUR DE L’ÎLE SAINT-BARNABÉ (RIMOUSKI, QUÉBEC) : DE LA MATÉRIALISATION D’UN MYTHE À LA PERFORMANCE ARCHÉOLOGIQUE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo estuda a evolução dos objetivos, das expectativas e dos interesses dos diferentes atores de uma experiência de intervenção arqueológica de longo prazo realizada no contexto universitário. A intervenção conciliava pesquisa, ensino e valorização, buscando equilibrar estas três dimensões que alimentavam reciprocamente. Este equilíbrio permitiu responder aos interesses de cada um dos atores: os da universidade, dos professores-pesquisadores e dos estudantes, os da municipalidade e do seu órgão de promoção turística, e os do publico em geral. Ao longo do tempo, o ensino assumiu uma importância cada vez maior e a valorização progressivamente assumiu a forma de uma performance arqueológica. Os autores questionam-se sobre a viabilidade à longo prazo deste tipo de valorização.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".