MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2887040748 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-1911

Abstract 1911: Uncovering novel targets of recurrent glioblastoma using transcriptomic profiling in a patient-derived xenograft model

2018· article· en· W2887040748 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Yelle, Chirayu Chokshi, Parvez Vora, Kevin R. Brown, Maleeha Qazi, Mohini Singh, Jarrett Adams, Chitra Venugopal, Sachdev S. Sidhu, Jason Moffat, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiation therapyMedicineTranscriptomeBrain tumorCancer researchStem cellCancer stem cellChemotherapyPopulationGlioblastomaOncologyMultimodal therapyCancerBiologyPathologyInternal medicineGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive adult primary brain tumor feared for its near uniformly fatal prognosis despite advances in multimodal therapy including surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiation. Poor patient survival due to tumor relapse is thought to be linked to intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH), driven by various environmental cues including chemotherapy and radiation treatment. ITH can be explained at the cellular level by the existence of multiple populations of cancer cells, including cancer stem cells (CSCs), which have acquired stemness properties like self-renewal, proliferation, and multilineage differentiation. In brain tumors, CSCs or brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs), have been shown to be resistant to both chemotherapy and radiation treatment, allowing them to escape therapy and allowing for tumor recurrence. To profile ITH as it evolves through therapy delivery, we have developed a novel and dynamic BTIC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of treatment-refractory human GBM, allowing for multimodal profiling of GBM BTICs through tumor engraftment, remission, and recurrence. In this study, we present the transcriptomic profiling at each stage, and novel target selection and validation through CRISPR/Cas9 knockouts, well-established in vitro stem cell assays, and in vivo characterization of their tumor initiation, development, and maintenance properties. Despite the fact that the BTIC population is responsible for GBM recurrence and thus patient demise, it remains a largely unknown landscape. Consequently, therapies that focus on targeting the BTIC compartment within the bulk tumor would provide better treatment and prognosis for patients with brain tumors. The study we present provides a unique therapeutic window into the recurrence of GBM, which drives patient mortality, yet is profiled far less than primary treatment-naïve GBM. Citation Format: Nicolas Yelle, Chirayu Chokshi, Parvez Vora, Kevin R. Brown, Maleeha A. Qazi, Mohini Singh, Jarrett J. Adams, Chitra Venugopal, Sachdev Sidhu, Jason Moffat, Sheila K. Singh. Uncovering novel targets of recurrent glioblastoma using transcriptomic profiling in a patient-derived xenograft model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1911.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→