La noblesse de la Nouvelle-France : un fait social accaparé par le pouvoir royal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les enquêtes de Louis XIV et Colbert n’ont eu que peu d’effets en Nouvelle-France où la noblesse n’avait pas la même signification ni les mêmes privilèges qu’en métropole. L’authenticité des titres et la recherche d’usurpateurs n’ont guère tracassé les administrateurs de la colonie, mais elles préoccupent davantage les historiens qui se heurtent à la sempiternelle difficulté de départager les vrais des moins vrais nobles du Canada. Le statut et la qualité nobiliaire des anoblis canadiens, des nobles venus de France, des faux nobles et de leurs descendants sont perçus de façons différentes selon qu’on aborde la noblesse comme un ordre fermé aux critères d’appartenance légalement définis ou comme un fait social dans lequel la population coloniale accréditait sans réticences les nobles qui se présentaient comme tels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".