MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887113898 · doi:10.1117/12.2280209

Quantitative compressional OCE: obviating pitfalls in using pre-calibrated compliant layers and some other practical obstacles

2018· article· en· W2887113898 on OpenAlexaff
Lev A. Matveev, Ekaterina V. Gubarkova, Grigory V. Gelikonov, Marina A. Sirotkina, I. Alex Vitkin, Vladimir Y. Zaitsev, Alexander A. Sovetsky, Alexander L. Matveyev, Natalia D. Gladkova, Elena V. Zagaynova

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurvatureStiffnessNonlinear systemModulusResolution (logic)Realization (probability)Materials scienceBiomedical engineeringComputer scienceAcousticsMathematicsPhysicsComposite materialArtificial intelligenceStatisticsEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this report we discuss some practical obstacles/pitfalls arising in realization of quantitative compressional OCE, as well as discuss possible ways of their resolution. More specifically we consider (i) complications in quantification of the Young modulus of tissues related to influence of partial adhesion between the OCT probe and pre-calibrated reference layers - "compliant sensors", (ii) distorting influence of surface curvature/corrugation on strain distribution in the tissue bulk, (iii) ways of enhancement of effective SNR in OCT-based strain mapping without periodic averaging, and (iv) potentially significant influence of nonlinearity of the elastic response of biological tissues on quantification of their stiffness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207