Analisis Sektor Unggulan dalam Meningkatkan Perekonomian dan Pembangunan Wilayah Provinsi Jambi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on pattern classification Typologi Klassen of the growth sectors of the economy in Jambi province makes the agricultural sector and the sector of mining and excavation are on the I quadrant i.e. as a sector that developed and developing fast, water procurement sector, trash, waste treatment and recycling, and education services sectors are at a quadrant II sectors advanced but that is depressed. After dianalis the pattern of growth sectors of the economy, may be known to the classification of economic sectors in the province of Jambi, for a deeper analysis of the sector required base with LQ method to find the base of the sector can be prioritized into the flagship sector. In accordance with the results of the analysis of the economic base by the method of LQ for the level of Jambi province are known to exist in four major sectors constituting the base sector of the economy. The fourth sector is agriculture, a sector of mining and excavation of the procurement sector, garbage, water, sewage treatment and recycling, and educational services. So, from both Typologi and Klassen LQ analysis it can be concluded that the economic sector in Jambi province which should be developed and can be prioritized into a flagship sector is agriculture, a sector of mining and excavation, the sector procurement of waste, water, sewage treatment and recycling, and education services sectors. Keywords: (1) GDP Jambi province; Indonesia'S GDP and (2) the rate of growth of GDP and contribution to Indonesia and Jambi province; (3) Data on the economic potential of Jambi province
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it