MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2887233605 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-3689

Abstract 3689: Identification of candidate therapeutic targets in BCG unresponsive bladder cancer- inflammatory subtypes of BCG unresponsive bladder cancer

2018· article· en· W2887233605 on OpenAlexaff
Woonyoung Choi, Roger Li, Chinedu Mmeje, I-ling Lee, Shanna Pretzsch, Jolanta Bondaruk, Max Kates, Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Bogdan Czerniak, Ashish M. Kamat, Colin P. Dinney, Peter C. Black, David J. McConkey

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBladder cancerImmunotherapyTranscriptomeCystectomyCancerImmune systemMedicineCancer researchImmunologyOncologyInternal medicineBiologyGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Intravesical immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is used for the first line treatment of high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Despite high initial response rates (70%), recurrence is a major problem and many patients develop BCG unresponsive disease, for which the primary treatment option is definitive surgery (cystectomy). In order to define the biological properties of BCG unresponsive disease, we performed whole transcriptome RNAseq on 29 matched tumors obtained from patients before and after the development of BCG resistance. Unsupervised cluster analysis revealed the presence of two clusters - BCG cluster 1, containing 8 pre- and 19-post BCG treatment tumors, and BCG cluster 2, containing 21 pre- and 10- post BCG tumors (Fisher's exact test, p<0.01). To characterize the biological properties of the two clusters, we extracted the significantly differentially expressed genes and analyzed them by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Sigma). Interestingly, multiple immune response pathways (T cell receptor signaling, IL8 signaling, IL12-mediated signaling, IFN-gamma pathways, immune cell trafficking, etc) were significantly enriched (p<0.01) in the BCG cluster 1 that was enriched for BCG unresponsive tumors. To determine the potential relationship between BCG clusters 1 and 2 and the previously defined basal and luminal molecular subtypes, we generated a batch-corrected bladder cancer meta-dataset combining two publically available datasets (GSE48075 and GSE32894) consisting of mixtures of non-muscle invasive and muscle-invasive tumors. We performed consensus cluster analysis using the meta-data and identified 3 distinct molecular clusters. The results indicated that the gene expression signature that characterized BCG cluster 1 was also present in tumors assigned to the basal/SCC-like and p53-like/infiltrated tumors defined previously. Together, the results indicate that the tumors in BCG cluster 1 may be enriched with T cells and therefore may have increased sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. However, it is likely that alternative therapeutic targets will need to be identified for BCG unresponsive tumors that display the ‘immune desert' phenotype characteristic of BCG cluster 2. Citation Format: Woonyoung Choi, Roger Li, Chinedu Mmeje, I-ling Lee, Shanna Pretzsch, Jolanta Bondaruk, Max Kates, Trinity Bivalacqua, Bogdan Czerniak, Ashish M. Kamat, Colin Dinney, Peter Black, David J. McConkey. Identification of candidate therapeutic targets in BCG unresponsive bladder cancer- inflammatory subtypes of BCG unresponsive bladder cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3689.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→