Clinical implications of muscle mass and quality in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
648 Background: Body composition has emerged as a potential prognostic factor for outcomes in early-stage CRC. Specifically, muscle mass and quality and visceral fat have been shown to be related to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The objective of this study was to determine associations of sarcopenia, reduced skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMR) and visceral obesity (VO) with 5-year OS and DFS. Methods: Muscle and visceral fat at the time of diagnosis were quantified in a retrospective cohort of consecutive, early-stage CRC patients (pts), identified from a prospectively collected cancer database. Skeletal muscle area on computed tomography (CT) was measured and normalized by height (m2) in order to compare skeletal muscle index (SMI) between pts. Mean SMR and visceral fat area were measured. All parameters were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate Cox regression. Sarcopenia was defined as SMI < 41 cm2/m2 in females and < 43 cm2/m2 in males with BMI < 25 kg/m2 and < 53 cm2/m2 with BMI > 25 kg/m2. Reduced SMR was defined as < 41 HU if BMI < 25 kg/m2 and < 33 HU if BMI > 25 kg/m2. VO was defined as VAT > 160cm2 in males and > 80cm2 in females. Results: We identified 968 pts with available CTs and anthropometric data. Prevalence of sarcopenia was 44.5% in males and 59.6% in females. Myosteatosis was present in 60.9% of pts. The mean length of follow up was 5.0 years, with 254 patients developing recurrent disease and 351 deaths. Males with sarcopenia and myosteatosis had worse overall survival (HR, 0.69, p = 0.005; HR 0.49, p < 0.001) but no difference in DFS. Presence of VO was not associated with worse OS or DFS. There was no difference in OS for females with sarcopenia or VO, but myosteatosis predicted reduced OS (HR 0.53, p = 0.004). There was no difference in DFS for females by presence of sarcopenia, myosteatosis or VO. Conclusions: Body composition, specifically sarcopenia and myosteatosis, are highly prevalent in CRC pts treated with curative intent, and their presence is associated with reduced OS. Therefore, skeletal muscle mass and radiodensity are important prognostic factors in CRC outcomes, which are easily attained in a clinical setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".